NEW YORK — More and more couples are throwing out the playbook for a traditional wedding — and posing new challenges for the people they hire to create the perfect images of their big day.
Getting married has traditionally involved a large reception, and rituals like cake cutting, multiple toasts and time for dancing. A wedding photographer would capture it all — and the newly hitched couple would then wait weeks or months for the pictures.

Bebeto Matthews, Associated Press
Jonica Moore, who is more than a decade into her second career as a wedding photographer, shoots photos July 21 as she walks home in Brooklyn. Moore said that said adding more social content to packages will likely require her to hire another person to help with weddings.
The pandemic and social media have upended those traditions. During the pandemic, many weddings turned into elopements. Social media images and videos took center stage when people couldn’t gather for a big ceremony.
Wedding photographers say some of the pandemic trends are sticking around. They’re being asked to shoot more elopements and micro-weddings — weddings with 50 or fewer guests — and to provide faster photos and behind-the-scenes videos that can easily be shared on social media. That’s on top of the regular wedding photos.
Many photographers also find themselves much more involved in planning the wedding. Nina Larsen Reed of Larsen Photo Co. in Boulder, Colorado, says couples increasingly rely on her local knowledge when planning their big day.
“Now I’m much more involved in everything from suggesting locations, building out timelines to recommending vendors and activities and really helping my couples plan for the whole day instead of just showing up to take photos of whatever they have planned on their own,” she said.
All of this means more work, leaving photographers to ponder whether they can do it all alone.
Kari Bjorn, owner of Kari Bjorn Photography in Fayetteville, Arkansas, said that to keep up with what clients are asking for, he’s added some new services to his wedding packages, like wedding-day GIFs. He’s also considering hiring a “day-of content creator,” a job he’s noticed being advertised frequently this year.

Bebeto Matthews, Associated Press
Wedding photographer Jonica Moore works July 21 from a Brooklyn cafe.
“Essentially it’s a contractor whose job it is to shoot and publish phone content for the bride and groom on their wedding day so they don’t have to,” he said. “I feel like people really want to post things instantly as their event is happening.”
Jonica Moore, owner of Jonica Moore Photography in Brooklyn, New York, said adding more social content to packages will likely require her to hire another person to help with weddings.
“If you’re a photographer, you don’t really have time to do that,” she said.
Adding help would mean more costs for photographers at a time when many have already raised their rates due to inflation.
After a plunge in 2020 and modest increase in 2021, the number of weddings jumped to 2.5 million in 2022 due to pent-up demand, according to the trade group Wedding Report. This year they’re expected to total 2.2 million as the U.S. returns to a more normal wedding cadence.
The cost of a wedding has gone up, according to data from wedding website The Knot, but not dramatically. The national average cost of a wedding in 2022 was $30,000, up $2,000 from 2021. In 2019, before the pandemic, that figure stood at $28,000.
Meanwhile, the average cost of a wedding photographer in 2022 was $2,600, up only $100 from 2021, although rates vary by location, time of year and the level of service. For instance, the mid-range cost in New York City is $5,000 to $7,500, Moore said.
Bjorn raised his rates after the boom year of 2022 but had to scale back a bit when he received fewer inquires than he was expecting.
“It’s been a roller coaster,” Bjorn said. “(Rates) are a little bit lower now than they were at the start of the year, but still higher than last year.”
Sarah and Peter Olson, a husband-and-wife team who run CityLux Studios in Boston, are spending much more time creating social media content than they did in years past, and are hiring an assistant to “specifically grab content we can use for social media and behind-the-scenes type content,” they said. They recently started to take videos vertically in short clips so their clients can use them for social media Reels on Instagram.

Steven Senne, Associated Press
Wedding photographer Sarah Olson, part of a husband-and-wife team who run CityLux Studios in Boston, said they recently started to take videos vertically in short clips so their clients can use them for social media Reels on Instagram.
“We try to deliver teasers on social media in 24 to 48 hours,” Peter Olson said.
Another pandemic trend that’s sticking around is smaller weddings and elopements.
That’s a trend Reed, the Boulder, Colorado, photographer is banking on. When the pandemic shutdown hit Boulder, big weddings evaporated and elopements surged. She switched to shooting only elopements and micro-weddings and decided to do that permanently.
“From talking to dozens of couples who chose to elope during the pandemic, many of them used the restrictions as an excuse to not plan a big, expensive wedding that they were never particularly excited about in the first place,” she said.
Reed expects the number of elopements to remain above pre-pandemic levels going forward as couples realize they can put the money saved on the wedding toward a honeymoon or a down payment on a home.

Bebeto Matthews, Associated Press
Wedding photographer Jonica Moore displays photos on her laptop July 21 at a Brooklyn cafe, where she sometimes edits her work.
Naomi Cataldo of Urban Row Photography in Baltimore, Maryland, said she hasn’t changed her offerings much due to demand for social media but now turns around photos in shorter time. She tweaked her editing process and brought it completely in-house to more fully control the timing. The process used to take eight to 10 weeks, but now she shares previews with the couple within the first week and the full gallery of edited photos within four to six weeks.
Meanwhile, Cataldo has noticed couples axing traditional wedding events like a bouquet toss or cutting the cake, and stretching out their wedding into a weekend celebration with all guests invited to a welcome party, wedding ceremony and brunch.
“Couples are asking for more personalized details and non-traditional, unique elements and events for their wedding day or weekend, and a lot less of just doing things for tradition’s sake,” she said.
-
Space Disco Cowboy? Couples ditch traditional wedding dress codes in favor of out-there themes
Canva
The average American wedding costs between $10,000 and $28,000. Some couples will spend up to $100,000 for a lavish event – or more. But the cost of a wedding doesn't only depend on the couple and their tastes: It also depends on where you live, and where you intend to get married.
To find where wedding costs are most and least expensive, SmartAsset examined wedding cost, income and savings data for 344 metro areas. The results may make you think twice about where you choose to get married.
Key Findings:
- Couples may still need to save for over six years for the cheapest weddings. The locations with the cheapest weddings may still take residents of those places over six years to save for. Despite having some of the cheapest wedding costs of all, places like Beckley, WV, Gadsden, AL, and Pine Bluff, AZ metro areas take those communities' residents longer than six years to save for the average local wedding.
- It can take as long as nine years to save for the average U.S. wedding. In some places – like in Goldsboro, NC, Binghamton, NY, and Cleveland, OH metro areas – it takes nearly nine years to save for a local wedding without any financial help. It may take half as much time in other parts of the U.S.
- Hawaii, California and the New York metro areas are home to many of the priciest nuptials. Honolulu, San Jose, Oxnard, New York City and Los Angeles rank among the top 10 most expensive weddings. The highest median wedding costs come in at nearly $28,000.

Canva
The average American wedding costs between $10,000 and $28,000. Some couples will spend up to $100,000 for a lavish event – or more. But the cost of a wedding doesn't only depend on the couple and their tastes: It also depends on where you live, and where you intend to get married.
To find where wedding costs are most and least expensive, SmartAsset examined wedding cost, income and savings data for 344 metro areas. The results may make you think twice about where you choose to get married.
Key Findings:
- Couples may still need to save for over six years for the cheapest weddings. The locations with the cheapest weddings may still take residents of those places over six years to save for. Despite having some of the cheapest wedding costs of all, places like Beckley, WV, Gadsden, AL, and Pine Bluff, AZ metro areas take those communities' residents longer than six years to save for the average local wedding.
- It can take as long as nine years to save for the average U.S. wedding. In some places – like in Goldsboro, NC, Binghamton, NY, and Cleveland, OH metro areas – it takes nearly nine years to save for a local wedding without any financial help. It may take half as much time in other parts of the U.S.
- Hawaii, California and the New York metro areas are home to many of the priciest nuptials. Honolulu, San Jose, Oxnard, New York City and Los Angeles rank among the top 10 most expensive weddings. The highest median wedding costs come in at nearly $28,000.

-
Space Disco Cowboy? Couples ditch traditional wedding dress codes in favor of out-there themes
SmartAsset
1. Honolulu, HI
If you're aiming for a destination wedding, Honolulu will cost you – $27,797 to be exact. While you can certainly aim for lower or higher, this median wedding cost was the highest of the bunch. With a Honolulu income, this will take a couple about 7.78 years to save for.
2. San Jose, CA
San Jose households earn the highest median income at $148,845, giving residents an edge when it comes to saving for a wedding. The average wedding cost of $27,378 is just a few hundred dollars shy of Honolulu.
3. Oxnard, CA
The Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura metro area, located up the coast from Los Angeles, ranks 266th overall, as it takes 7.10 years to save for a $26,991 wedding. Residents here would have to save an average of $3,797 per year.
4. Bridgeport, CT
Couples in the Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk area face an average wedding cost of $26,719. The cost of living in the Bridgeport area is about 29% higher than the average American metro, while the median household salary is $107,261.
5. New York City, NY
The NYC metro area unsurprisingly has a costly average wedding at $26,206. When compared with the top four most expensive places for a wedding, New Yorkers would have to save less ($3,323 per year). However, it will still take them longer – 7.88 years to pay for that wedding.
6. Los Angeles, CA
In general, the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim metro area costs 52.5% more than the average U.S. city. A wedding costs $25,713, and it will take 7.91 years to save for this milestone on an $87,783 household income.
7. Seattle, WA
It takes 6.40 years to save for the average $25,639 wedding in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue metro area. Living in Seattle is just as expensive as Los Angeles, with a 52.2% cost of living premium.
8. Philadelphia, PA
Couples in the Philadelphia metro area have low median salaries when compared with other expensive places for weddings. This puts savers at a particular disadvantage. It takes 8.09 years to save for a $25,448 wedding on an $85,127 salary. Only 10 metro areas have longer savings times.
9. Washington, DC
The Washington-Arlington-Alexandria metro area ranks 40th for the time it takes to save for a wedding – 5.75 years. While a wedding here costs just a few dollars shy of $25,000, this metro area has the second highest median household income ($117,417).
10. New Haven, CT
The average wedding in the New Haven-Milford metro area costs $24,759. With a relatively low median household income of $80,113, it takes 8.35 years to save for this milestone without any financial help.
Least expensive weddings
On the other hand, some places offer particularly inexpensive weddings. While local wages may suppress the time it takes to save in some of these areas, they have the least expensive weddings by cost. Only Tuscaloosa and Waco also make the top 10 list when it comes to the shortest time to save up.
- Tuscaloosa, AL Metro Area
- Fort Smith, AR-OK Metro Area
- Beckley, WV Metro Area
- Gadsden, AL Metro Area
- Dothan, AL Metro Area
- Hot Springs, AR Metro Area
- Carbondale-Marion, IL Metro Area
- Pine Bluff, AR Metro Area
- Waco, TX Metro Area
- Jonesboro, AR Metro Area
SmartAsset
1. Honolulu, HI
If you're aiming for a destination wedding, Honolulu will cost you – $27,797 to be exact. While you can certainly aim for lower or higher, this median wedding cost was the highest of the bunch. With a Honolulu income, this will take a couple about 7.78 years to save for.
2. San Jose, CA
San Jose households earn the highest median income at $148,845, giving residents an edge when it comes to saving for a wedding. The average wedding cost of $27,378 is just a few hundred dollars shy of Honolulu.
3. Oxnard, CA
The Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura metro area, located up the coast from Los Angeles, ranks 266th overall, as it takes 7.10 years to save for a $26,991 wedding. Residents here would have to save an average of $3,797 per year.
4. Bridgeport, CT
Couples in the Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk area face an average wedding cost of $26,719. The cost of living in the Bridgeport area is about 29% higher than the average American metro, while the median household salary is $107,261.
5. New York City, NY
The NYC metro area unsurprisingly has a costly average wedding at $26,206. When compared with the top four most expensive places for a wedding, New Yorkers would have to save less ($3,323 per year). However, it will still take them longer – 7.88 years to pay for that wedding.
6. Los Angeles, CA
In general, the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim metro area costs 52.5% more than the average U.S. city. A wedding costs $25,713, and it will take 7.91 years to save for this milestone on an $87,783 household income.
7. Seattle, WA
It takes 6.40 years to save for the average $25,639 wedding in the Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue metro area. Living in Seattle is just as expensive as Los Angeles, with a 52.2% cost of living premium.
8. Philadelphia, PA
Couples in the Philadelphia metro area have low median salaries when compared with other expensive places for weddings. This puts savers at a particular disadvantage. It takes 8.09 years to save for a $25,448 wedding on an $85,127 salary. Only 10 metro areas have longer savings times.
9. Washington, DC
The Washington-Arlington-Alexandria metro area ranks 40th for the time it takes to save for a wedding – 5.75 years. While a wedding here costs just a few dollars shy of $25,000, this metro area has the second highest median household income ($117,417).
10. New Haven, CT
The average wedding in the New Haven-Milford metro area costs $24,759. With a relatively low median household income of $80,113, it takes 8.35 years to save for this milestone without any financial help.
Least expensive weddings
On the other hand, some places offer particularly inexpensive weddings. While local wages may suppress the time it takes to save in some of these areas, they have the least expensive weddings by cost. Only Tuscaloosa and Waco also make the top 10 list when it comes to the shortest time to save up.
- Tuscaloosa, AL Metro Area
- Fort Smith, AR-OK Metro Area
- Beckley, WV Metro Area
- Gadsden, AL Metro Area
- Dothan, AL Metro Area
- Hot Springs, AR Metro Area
- Carbondale-Marion, IL Metro Area
- Pine Bluff, AR Metro Area
- Waco, TX Metro Area
- Jonesboro, AR Metro Area
-
-
Space Disco Cowboy? Couples ditch traditional wedding dress codes in favor of out-there themes
SmartAsset
1. Waco, TX
The lack of state income taxes in Texas and a low cost of living will help expedite saving for a wedding in Waco. An average wedding costs $11,120, which will take 4.70 years to save up for on the local household income.
2. Tuscaloosa, AL
Tuscaloosa has the least expensive weddings, sneaking in under Waco at $10,045. However, the average household income is about $6,500 lower at $57,453. This means that couples here will have to save for 4.72 years – slightly longer than in the Waco metro area.
3. Cape Girardeau, MO-IL
The Cape Girardeau metro area ranks closely to Waco and Tuscaloosa. It takes 4.74 years to save for a wedding here. Meanwhile, the cost of living is about 5% cheaper than average.
4. San Jose, CA
The San Jose metro area has the highest wedding costs of all, but the high incomes here help compensate for the costs. A wedding averages over $27,000 in San Jose, but the household income sits at nearly $150,000. So it will only take couples 4.97 years to save for a wedding.
5. Bowling Green, KY
The annual savings for a household in Bowling Green is $2,246. At that rate, it'll take just over five years to save for a $11,282 wedding.
Cities with the longest time to save for a wedding
These places have a particularly high wedding cost relative to the local median income. It takes more than eight years to save for a wedding in these areas.
- Goldsboro, NC Metro Area
- Binghamton, NY Metro Area
- Cleveland-Elyria, OH Metro Area
- Lawrence, KS Metro Area
- Vineland-Bridgeton, NJ Metro Area
Methodology
The study compared the personal savings rate, median household income and median wedding cost to determine how many years it would take a couple living together to save for a wedding. Researchers assumed that the couple receives no financial help and earns the median household income.
Data
- Median household income: St. Louis FRED wage growth data for 2022 was applied to the median household income for metro areas from the U.S. Census Bureau ACS 1 Year, 2021 to derive 2022 household income.
- Personal savings rate: St. Louis FRED, 2022.
- Median wedding cost: The Wedding Report, 2022.
This story was produced by SmartAsset and reviewed and distributed by Stacker Media.
SmartAsset
1. Waco, TX
The lack of state income taxes in Texas and a low cost of living will help expedite saving for a wedding in Waco. An average wedding costs $11,120, which will take 4.70 years to save up for on the local household income.
2. Tuscaloosa, AL
Tuscaloosa has the least expensive weddings, sneaking in under Waco at $10,045. However, the average household income is about $6,500 lower at $57,453. This means that couples here will have to save for 4.72 years – slightly longer than in the Waco metro area.
3. Cape Girardeau, MO-IL
The Cape Girardeau metro area ranks closely to Waco and Tuscaloosa. It takes 4.74 years to save for a wedding here. Meanwhile, the cost of living is about 5% cheaper than average.
4. San Jose, CA
The San Jose metro area has the highest wedding costs of all, but the high incomes here help compensate for the costs. A wedding averages over $27,000 in San Jose, but the household income sits at nearly $150,000. So it will only take couples 4.97 years to save for a wedding.
5. Bowling Green, KY
The annual savings for a household in Bowling Green is $2,246. At that rate, it'll take just over five years to save for a $11,282 wedding.
Cities with the longest time to save for a wedding
These places have a particularly high wedding cost relative to the local median income. It takes more than eight years to save for a wedding in these areas.
- Goldsboro, NC Metro Area
- Binghamton, NY Metro Area
- Cleveland-Elyria, OH Metro Area
- Lawrence, KS Metro Area
- Vineland-Bridgeton, NJ Metro Area
Methodology
The study compared the personal savings rate, median household income and median wedding cost to determine how many years it would take a couple living together to save for a wedding. Researchers assumed that the couple receives no financial help and earns the median household income.
Data
- Median household income: St. Louis FRED wage growth data for 2022 was applied to the median household income for metro areas from the U.S. Census Bureau ACS 1 Year, 2021 to derive 2022 household income.
- Personal savings rate: St. Louis FRED, 2022.
- Median wedding cost: The Wedding Report, 2022.
This story was produced by SmartAsset and reviewed and distributed by Stacker Media.